Case Overview
Our client indirectly referred to a conflict with another person on a personal Instagram account. The other person, believing the post made them identifiable and amounted to defamation by both false and true statements of fact, filed a criminal complaint against our client for defamation.
Our Strategy
Our strategy in this case centered on proving the absence of both 'identifiability' and 'intent to defame.' We emphasized that our client had not directly named the other party in the post and that it was nothing more than a general expression of feeling. We further argued that, in context, the post was in the nature of a private venting of emotion rather than a matter of public interest, and therefore did not satisfy the elements of defamation. Through consistent statements during the police investigation, we established the absence of criminal intent and secured a No Charges Filed decision.
Result · No Charges Filed
Defamation via a Social Media Account

This is the result of an individual case and does not guarantee a similar outcome. Some facts have been generalized and personal information redacted to protect the client.
More Results in This Area
KRW 200 Million Court-Approved Settlement Against Corporate and Individual Account Holders in IPO Scam Impersonating a Major Securities Firm
Our client, deceived by an SNS community impersonating a well-known fi…
View case →Full WinFull Recovery on Primary Joint Wrongdoing Claim Against Money Mule Account Holders in Electronic Financial Fraud
Our client, deceived by the fraudulent conduct of a new type of electr…
View case →Full WinWin on Joint Liability in Unlisted Cryptocurrency Mission Scam, Rejecting the 'Remittance Part-Time Job' Defense
Our client was signed up, through a promotional call, on an app impers…
View case →Attorney in charge: Dongwoo Shin