Case Overview
This case arose from a drunken act of violence in front of a township office in the Chungnam region, followed by damage to a vehicle near the victim's residence, for which the defendant was indicted for bodily injury and aggravated destruction of property. The Prosecution alleged that the defendant had pushed the victim to the ground with his hands, causing injury, and then damaged the victim's car with a pitchfork near the victim's home. Because a dangerous object was allegedly used to damage the property, the aggravated form of the offense was charged, and the victim further alleged being struck on the head with a frying pan, giving rise to an additional charge of aggravated bodily injury.
Our Strategy
DAEON Law Firm focused on the fact that the core charge of 'aggravated bodily injury' lacked clear evidence as to the defendant's intent and whether an instrument was used. Defense counsel emphasized that the victim's statements were inconsistent and that even the police officers who responded to the scene had not confirmed the location or use of the instrument (a frying pan) that formed the key basis of the aggravated charge. We further undermined the credibility of the victim's account by highlighting that the statement of a third party present at the scene contradicted the victim's and that the circumstances in which the injury occurred were themselves unclear. In addition, we argued that the injury claimed by the victim rested solely on a concussion diagnosis with no external wounds and that, given the violent scuffle at the time, the direct cause of the injury could not be determined, reasoning that produced a not-guilty finding on that count. The defendant thereby avoided severe criminal punishment and was sentenced only to a fine.
Result · Fine
Drunken Assault Case in Which the 'Aggravated Bodily Injury' Charge Was Found Not Guilty

This is the result of an individual case and does not guarantee a similar outcome. Some facts have been generalized and personal information redacted to protect the client.
More Results in This Area
KRW 200 Million Court-Approved Settlement Against Corporate and Individual Account Holders in IPO Scam Impersonating a Major Securities Firm
Our client, deceived by an SNS community impersonating a well-known fi…
View case →Full WinFull Recovery on Primary Joint Wrongdoing Claim Against Money Mule Account Holders in Electronic Financial Fraud
Our client, deceived by the fraudulent conduct of a new type of electr…
View case →Full WinWin on Joint Liability in Unlisted Cryptocurrency Mission Scam, Rejecting the 'Remittance Part-Time Job' Defense
Our client was signed up, through a promotional call, on an app impers…
View case →Attorney in charge: Dongwoo Shin