DUI & Traffic Accident Center · Case Type

If you were reported for retaliatory driving,
the turning point is whether you meant to frighten the other driver

Because the law can treat a car as a "dangerous object," threatening someone with a car becomes a serious offense such as special intimidation. But the conclusion is entirely different depending on whether you braked because a cutting-in car startled you or because you wanted to frighten the other driver.

Key Points

  • Threatening someone with a car is special intimidation (up to 7 years in prison or a fine of up to KRW 10 million); injuring them is special injury (1 to 10 years in prison); and damaging their car is special property damage (up to 5 years in prison or a fine of up to KRW 10 million).
  • Endangering the road by committing successive violations without targeting a particular person is reckless driving (up to 1 year in prison or a fine of up to KRW 5 million), based on Article 151-2 of the Road Traffic Act.
  • The moment you are booked for retaliatory driving, your license is suspended (100 penalty points), and if you are detained it is revoked (Annex 28 of the Enforcement Rule).
  • If you prove with dashcam footage why you braked suddenly or blocked the lane and what happened before and after, you can deny intent. DAEON Law Firm has obtained a no-charge decision in a retaliatory driving case.

How the two differ

Retaliatory driving is intentionally threatening behavior aimed at a specific person, so it falls under the Criminal Act. Reckless driving means committing two or more of the following in succession, or repeating the same one, so as to threaten or harm others or create a traffic hazard: running a signal, crossing the center line, speeding, violating lane-change prohibitions, or violating the ban on sudden braking. Article 46-3 of the Road Traffic Act prohibits it.

Applicable provisions by act
ActProvision
Threatening by sudden braking or pushing another carArticle 284 of the Criminal Act (special intimidation)
Assault such as deliberately rammingArticle 261 of the Criminal Act (special assault)
Causing injury with a carArticle 258-2(1) of the Criminal Act (special injury)
Damaging the other carArticle 369(1) of the Criminal Act (special property damage)
Reckless drivingArticle 151-2(1) of the Road Traffic Act
Penalties by act
OffensePrisonFine
Special intimidationUp to 7 yearsUp to KRW 10 million
Special assaultUp to 5 yearsUp to KRW 10 million
Special injury1 to 10 yearsNone
Special property damageUp to 5 yearsUp to KRW 10 million
Reckless drivingUp to 1 yearUp to KRW 5 million

To contest intent

  • Why did you stop suddenly? · We look at whether you stopped for another reason, such as the car ahead braking hard or an animal or fallen object appearing. The forward footage from your own dashcam is the most important.
  • The context before and after · We check whether the other driver cut in dangerously first, whether horns or high beams were exchanged before and after, and how long the threatening behavior continued.
  • Did it reach the level of a threat? · We examine whether a brief lane change or a single honk was enough to amount to intimidation. We analyze the distance and speed relative to the other car.

Dashcam footage submitted by the other party is often edited or only partly submitted. Simply matching the full original against your own footage frequently changes the picture of the case.

Effect on your license

A person who commits special injury, special assault, special intimidation or special property damage using a vehicle is subject to license revocation or suspension (Article 93(1)10-2 of the Road Traffic Act). Annex 28 of the Enforcement Rule provides for 100 penalty points (suspension) when booked and revocation when detained. If a no-charge decision becomes final, the action is canceled and the penalty points are deleted.

Frequently Asked Questions

I braked once in front of a car that cut in, and I was reported for retaliatory driving.
Even a single braking can be special intimidation if an intent to threaten and the degree of danger are found. But if you braked because of the situation ahead or to widen the safe distance, you can contest it by proving through footage that there was no intent.
The other driver threatened me first.
Where both threatened each other, both can be booked. If there is footage of the other driver's threats, you can file a counter-complaint and also argue that your response was justified.
If I settle, will I avoid punishment for retaliatory driving?
Special intimidation can be punished regardless of the victim's wishes. Even so, a settlement increases the likelihood that the case ends with a suspension of indictment (the prosecutor decides not to charge) or a fine.

Related Guides

Written on the basis of Korean statutes in force (National Law Information Center, Ministry of Government Legislation) and court precedents as of October 20, 2026. Results may differ with amendments to the law or the facts of each case. This page is general information, not legal advice.

In a legal matter, the first response often decides the outcome

Every consultation is handled by the managing attorney himself — in person, by phone or online, in English or Korean.